I'm really not sure what to make of this Kellen Winslow Jr. situation. The sequence of events went something like this:
- Winslow spent a few days in the hospital with a staph infection.
- The Browns didn't want anybody to know what it was because they were gaining a reputation for spreading staph infections.
- The team didn't tell anybody and asked him not to tell anybody either.
- Everybody wondered what was wrong with Winslow, and people were filling in the blanks on their own. I actually heard someone speculate that he'd contracted a social disease.
- Winslow missed a game, which incidentally was the best game the Browns have played in years.
- Winslow got out of the hospital and played in the next game, which incidentally didn't go well at all for the Browns.
- Winslow complained after the game that he felt like a piece of meat, because Phil Savage never called him while he was in the hospital with a staph infection.
- Savage suspended Winslow for a game, without pay, for making comments that were "unwarranted, inappropriate, and unnecessarily disparaging to our organisation."
- Winslow appealed his suspension.
But there's a right way to do things, and there's a wrong way. Popping off publicly about how your GM behaved while you were in the hospital is the wrong way. Then again, suspending a player for popping off is probably not productive either.
What a mess.
1 comment:
Post a Comment